In 2023, the goal of many companies has been to maintain profitability by cutting spend, slashing budgets, laying off employees, eliminating certain benefits, and closing unused office space.
This has put both Finance and Legal teams at the forefront of many decisions. While Finance is responsible for giving the red or green light on decisions, Legal has had to make sure all actions carried out are done in accordance with legal and contractual obligations.
But with costs under so much scrutiny, Legal must also find ways to get more done with less.
Despite the challenge, this is Legal’s chance to shine and assert its role as the company’s strategic business partner. The opportunity to cut contract costs, amplify the value of contracts, and make a material impact on the company’s bottom line has never been more timely.
In addition to good data management, we gathered insights from several clients and legal experts about how they work with contracts to generate more savings and revenue for their organization.
A mistake – no matter how incidental it is – is still a mistake. In the best-case scenario, it’s laughed off with no harm done.
However, history has shown us that courts won’t show leniency if a mistake incurs massive financial damages, even if it was by pure chance.
As one lawyer from Australia described, “It’s always the same mistake: Not reading the contract, and not knowing what’s in it before you sign it. Finding out the brutal truth when you are sitting in a courtroom five years later and about to be bankrupted is really the wrong time to discover what the contract says.”
Here are a few other historical examples of costly mistakes in contracts:
In 2009, when the company Taylor & Son went out of business, the UK’s Companies House inadvertently added an extra “s” to the end of the company’s name. The mistake was corrected three days later.
This might not have been a problem had there not been a company already named Taylor & Sons. Once word spread that Taylor & Sons was supposedly in trouble, the company lost its clients, creditors, and contracts, causing the company to go into bankruptcy and more than 250 people to lose their jobs.
In 2015, the UK High Court ruled in Taylor & Sons’ favor, citing that Companies House owed “reasonable care” when entering information. The case would ultimately be settled in 2017 for tens of millions of dollars.
The US Tariff Act of 1872 also featured a costly typo, specifying “foreign fruit, plants” as exempt from tariffs instead of “foreign fruit-plants”. The error was eventually fixed by Congress, but not before it lost the US government over $2 million (about 0.7% of the national budget at the time).
Adjusting for today’s $6.27 trillion budget, if a similar mistake were to occur and cause the same financial impact, the US would lose almost $439 billion dollars.
Companies experience their fair share of costly errors as well. For example, JPMorgan lost $6 billion when an employee copied and pasted the wrong information from one spreadsheet into another.
Other business and organizations like Barclays and TransAlta have also suffered their share of mistakes when managing data.
As one of our clients put it, there’s no such thing as a 100% error-free contract. According to them, “Even if you wrote the best contract in the world, a court or appeals court might disagree with you for many subjective reasons.”
Despite our efforts to make a contract’s language as objective as possible, language is still very subjective and ripe for debate. If a contract can be voided or overwritten, this means that not even the best contracts in the world are completely ironclad.
If there is a mistake, parties have the option of working together to rectify the contract and fix the error. In cases where a mistake gives an advantage to one party, the disadvantaged party may bring legal action to force contract rectification.
Not only is the latter solution more costly, but it has the potential to ruin the business arrangement. That’s why it’s always preferable to come to a mutual agreement to fix the mistake.
It’s estimated that poor contract management can cost an organization up to 9% of its annual revenue. In numbers, if your company’s revenue is $1 million, this means your company automatically loses $90,000 because of poor contracting.
Many mistakes occur during the drafting process. To limit the number of errors in your contracts, here are a few contract secrets you can put into action:
These aren’t the only tactics at your disposal to dramatically reduce the chance of contract mistakes. More importantly, leveraging legal technology like contract automation engines and CLM systems will help you speed up contract management and reduce contracting issues, netting you a positive ROI.
With the global economy on the brink of recession, companies are racing to discover value or unearth savings wherever possible. By simply putting into place contingencies that prevent mistakes from creeping into contracts, Legal is able to unlock significant cost savings for their organization.
As one executive vice-president phrased it, “Contracts are often negotiable, so don’t just assume that when someone hands you a contract to sign it, it’s ‘take it or leave it.’ It never hurts to ask for more, or to eliminate some burdens in there.”
Legal has several more weapons available in its arsenal. Here are a few extra actionable steps for Legal to demonstrate their value through contracting:
These are just a few of the many ways legal teams can tap into their potential as a key strategic business partner.
Reducing the risk of mistakes and negotiating contract terms are some of the options available for Legal to show their value. ContractWorks CLM makes it easy for legal teams who want to drive more revenue to pursue not just these value-generating options, but many more.
Book a demo to learn how ContractWorks CLM software can help your team unlock more golden opportunities.